Plausible Deniability

Jim Biden chuckled smugly and simply answered, “Plausible Deniability.”

Photo by Pixabay on

Hmmm? Did he really say that? I can’t believe my ears. Yesterday in an interview on The Tucker Show, Bobulinski (who was hired by the Biden Family for expertise in their foreign transactions) was relaying a conversation with Hunter and Jim Biden when he asked them how are you all getting away with this? This could ruin your chances of ever running for president referring to Joe Biden. Answer: “Plausible Deniability.”

Plausible Deniability Law and Legal Definition:

[Plausible deniability refers to circumstances where a denial of responsibility or knowledge of wrongdoing cannot be proved as true or untrue due to a lack of evidence proving the allegation. This term is often used in reference to situations where high ranking officials deny responsibility for or knowledge of wrongdoing by lower ranking officials. In those situations officials can “plausibly deny” an allegation even though it may be true.] USLegal

[In politics and espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a powerful player or intelligence agency to pass the buck and to avoid blowback by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on its behalf by a third party that is ostensibly unconnected with the major player. In political campaigns, plausible deniability enables candidates to stay clean and denounce third-party advertisements that use unethical approaches or potentially-libelous innuendo.

Although plausible deniability has existed throughout history, the term was coined by the CIA in the early 1960s to describe the withholding of information from senior officials to protect them from repercussions if illegal or unpopular activities became public knowledge.] Wikipedia

When I heard this term used in relation to the Vice President of the United States, I knew this guy is done. If anyone had watched this interview they couldn’t, in sound mind, vote for a guy that was engaged in such illegal transactions. Bobulinski then asked, “Where’s the money? How are you able to pull this off?” as Bobulinski had not received anything for his expertise advice. It wasn’t clear what they answered something about it was received as a LOAN from China. A loan. So are loans not claimed as income on our taxes? Is this so-called loan just a money laundering scheme whereby they get the money, but never need to report it or pay it back to China. Sounds like it. The FBI needs to pull the Bidens’ bank statements for large incoming amounts. Paid in Chinese currency? Check under their mattresses and safe deposit boxes too. This will make a great political crime movie someday.

Where the hell is the FBI on this? They’ve interviewed this fellow as well, and we see nothing happening. At least Comey came to the mic. Where the hell is Chris Wray? Someone better come forward to the public ASAP or this whole election needs to be postponed. Biden is comprised up to his eyeballs with China and should be behind bars. But, apparently, all he has to do is claim Plausible Deniability and they leave him alone?

I just wish they had given Trump such leeway during his denial of Russia Collusion hoax and Ukraine quid pro quo sham instead they impeached him.

So today we have the social media billionaires smugly denying any sort of political bias against Trump, New York Post, Republican Senators and Congressmen, but they gleefully allow tweets from Iran which say the holocaust never happened and they want Israel off of the map. But Trump’s tweet warning the public that mail in ballots are not safe, gets shut down. And the New York Post bombshell articles exposing the illegal activities of Joe Biden via Hunter’s laptop gets shutdown. They also flippantly printed from an anonymous source pages from Trump’s so-called tax return. But they aren’t trying to effect an election nor run cover for the Biden campaign? Please. It’s insulting to our intelligence to even listen to these goons.

The only reason these clowns made it big was some computer fluke that caught on. In the real world, they wouldn’t know how to do crap. I wish we could shut their social medias down for breaking rules of being impartial. Everyone knows their media is used by Black Lives Matter to stir up riots and they go untouched from censoring. They obviously pick and choose and have selective censoring but refuse to admit it. They are three knuckleheads that should at a minimum be fined for conspiring to suppress information on a candidate during an election. But they will claim plausible deniability.


2 thoughts on “Plausible Deniability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s