If the court finds that the raid on his Mar-a-Lago home was done without probable cause and nothing more than a vague fishing exhibition (which it is looking like), EVERYTHING seized during the illegal raid will be considered inadmissible in a court of law. In other words, it will be thrown out as evidence and can never be used against him again. Sort of like double jeopardy.
If our AG Garland is this stupid to commit an illegal search and seizure which is protected by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution* of a former president’s home, he must be dumber than a first year law student. Thank God he was not placed in our Supreme Court. I know this from watching Law & Order. Maybe Garland should take some time to review his law books rather than searching for the illusive white supremacist or going after parents or Trump and his supporters. The only reason he was chosen for this job was a consolation prize at Obama’s request. Time to resign, Garland. You blew it. You wanted to look like a hero but are looking like a zero.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.“ LII (Not rifling through Melania’s wardrobe.)
**Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
“A doctrine that extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived from evidence that was illegally obtained. As the metaphor suggests, if the evidential “tree” is tainted, so is its “fruit.” The doctrine was established in 1920 by the decision in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, and the phrase “fruit of the poisonous tree” was coined by Justice Frankfurter in his 1939 opinion in Nardone v. United States.” LII
In short, the FEDs would have been better off if they were honest in their warrant which should have read: “Search for any documents relating to Russia Collusion, Hillary’s involvement behind Russia Collusion, and FBI’s involvement behind Russia Collusion.” But, of course, they don’t want it to get out that there is even more evidence of FBI and Hillary colluding in the Russia Hoax put upon Trump. So they made the warrant vague so as not to implicate themselves but in essence got what they wanted and should drop it; but they are out for Trump’s blood and can’t resist continuing with their charade. It should backfire in their guilty faces.
Let’s hope Trump’s lawyers are on top of this.
Lastly, for Alan Dershowitz to say he’s on Trump’s side on this but that he never voted for Trump but voted for Biden, makes him look like a Democrat first and smart lawyer second. It also makes all his arguments sort of hold no weight when he admits to voting for Biden just because he’s a Democrat. Stupid comment. Most Jewish are Democrats and vote only out of tradition. Wise up, Jewish. Democrats are not for Israel or for the Jews. Trump did more for Israel than any previous president and it’s a slap in the face for a Jew to not vote for him. Wake up Dershowitz!