Category: Uncategorized

Any Congressman that Votes for Impeachment is Either Corrupt or Stupid…

Image result for images of judge hitting gavel

 

And neither is a quality we want in our congressman.  Schiff talks a big story about Trump being unethical; but it is HE and his CLAN that are.  What they’re trying to pull off in plain sight of America is the biggest sham since the Mueller sham and We the People aren’t going to take it any longer.

We need to vote OUT any congressman or woman that votes for impeachment. They are worthless and not worthy of their position in congress. We are better than this!  And deserve better than this!

None of what came out in the hearings rises to the level of impeaching a president.  It was all hearsay and policy opinions from diplomats that were Obama holdovers.  No harm, no foul. Obviously, it was a set up from the get go by Schiff, whistleblower, Pelosi, and their puppet masters–TBD–and was a sham of a hearing. Or as Rush says, “All roads lead to Obama.”

As my devil’s advocate son says, “If they take down Trump on a quid pro quo, they’ll have to take down Biden too.”  And we all know that won’t be something these congressmen will want to happen.

An FBI employee during the Obama Administration that worked under Strzok and probably took his orders from him, altered/changed a document used in the FISA application to warrant spying on the Trump Administration. He is currently under criminal investigation. This act was the beginning of the COUP that led to Trump Campaign being spied on and Comey being fired and the eventual Mueller Probe.

So, it’s happening.  The cards are beginning to fall and this is why Schiff and his clan are trying to DISTRACT the news from the real criminal investigation.  Yes, there was a criminal in the White House Kamala Harris, but it wasn’t President Trump.  TBD.  All roads lead to you know who.

Biden recently scolded a man at one of his town hall meetings who said Obama deported illegals just like Trump.  Biden responded,  “Never compare President Obama to ‘this guy’.”  For Biden to call Trump ‘this guy’ shows his hatred for the president.

A.G. Barr will continue doing his work as well as Durham and Horowitz; so no matter what the left tries to do to Trump to distract from the real crimes, justice will still be served.  NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!

Stay strong Trump.  You don’t deserve what the left is doing to you.  The truth will prevail as you’re in good hands with the DOJ.

Stay tuned!

Sunken Schiff.

 

Image result for images of sunken ships

No grounds for impeachment just hearsay, conjecture, presumptions, and a little sour grapes. No high crimes and misdemeanors or bribery or treason or even a parking ticket. The honorable witnesses that came in to testify should be ashamed for being part of this charade. A government official that eavesdrops on our president’s phone call and spreads it to others, is dishonorable.

It was unfair and rude the way Schiff conducted these hearings not to allow ONE witness from the Republican side together with his interruptions and cutting off speaking members with his gavel.  I don’t know how they kept their cool. Total sham, total witch hunt, total disrespect, total set up, total unAmerican, total hoax, total Schiffwreck. Total stain on American History.

I just pray that the sham ends here, and that Pelosi grows a brain or at least a conscience, neither of which she has shown. We know Schiff won’t.

Image result for images of a brain

 

It’s Clear Now Why Dems Want/Need Impeachment.

 

selective focus photography of pink and black framed eyeglasses
Photo by Designecologist on Pexels.com

After last night’s awful Democrat Presidential Debate, I can see clearly now why the Democrats are pushing for impeachment. What they have put on stage to possibly go up against Trump ranged from pathetic to embarrassing and I’m being kind.  The biased moderators were a joke, too.  Four women (not one male) asked loaded, leading, and, frankly, untruthful premises to questions of the candidates.

For instance, the first question out of the gate was from Rachel Madcow: “bombshell testimony from Sondland proves that Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine…etc.” and she asked Warren if she’ll be able to vote for his impeachment.  This was the impetus for many cruel attacks on Trump ranging from: a criminal living in the White House, most corrupt president in modern history, pathological liar, fragile ego, makes decisions based on his next tweet, embraced thugs, no idea what he’s doing, repugnant and appalling, impeachable conduct and abuse of power, started crisis at border, caging children,  greatest threat to our national security, putting our country in worse financial condition daily, engaged in corruption, violated the emoluments clause, indicted himself, thinks he’s above the law, and has told over 10,000 lies.  All lies. It’s amazing our country has lasted three years under Trump with all this lawlessness and incompetence.

All the candidates claim they did “not come from money” but they actually weren’t even middle class which most Americans are proud to admit.  They admit to being lower class. Daughters of janitors and single working moms, living in a two-bedroom house with four children, sleeping in the garage, eating food from cans; but, seriously, yet they were able to attend ivy league universities.  How is that?  They say only the rich can go to good colleges and get good healthcare, yet they claim they came from rags.  “Molested by uncles” in reference to abortion flowed from Warren’s tongue just a little too easy, making me cringe.  What kind of uncles did she know? Somewhere along the line they gamed the system which leads me to believe they weren’t honest or really played the minority and/or LBGT cards.

Out of ten candidates only two sounded sane: Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang, but we don’t want their radical policies.  The rest were even more radical: One rich climate change nut, one ex-prosecutor who wants to keep prosecuting, one Pelosi protege, one communist, one corporation-hater, a gay guy that doesn’t golf, a vegan, pot-smoking Rhodes Scholar, and a partridge in a pear tree.  That leaves us with Biden.  I actually felt for him everytime he was asked a question.  He looked nervous, ashamed, and out of his league. But I did like the way he stood up to Booker saying that he didn’t think marijuana should be legalized nationally.  Good for him.

Image result for images of a partridge in a pear tree

Tulsi claimed “Bush-Clinton-Trump-Regime-change-wars” yet Trump hasn’t gone to war.  And she conveniently left out Obama’s Benghazi. I thought that was very telling.  She conversely left out Trump when saying that it is good to meet with dictators and credited Reagan and other presidents. Not one candidate gave Trump credit for anything he’s accomplished and the moderators avoided questions on the great economy.  Climate change, Voter Suppression, White Supremacy, Metoo movement were big topics.  Really?  Those are the biggest problems America faces?  What happened to immigration reform, trade tariffs, USMCA, nuclear proliferation, border security, homeless problem, sanctuary cities, and school security?

Bernie claimed we’ve only got eight years left before cities will go under water. Bernie’s been drinking the AOC Kool Aid. Biden thinks Metoo movement is violence against women. It’s a gigantic issue!   Someone needs to tell him it’s “sexual harassment in the workplace” not violence. Boot-a-judge thinks Trump is building moats filled with alligators. And Booker claims congress is smoking pot. That I may agree with. Kamala even admitted to it.

All in all, I can see clearly why the Dems need to impeach Trump as these candidates are Not Ready For Prime Time, and they know it.

Clueless Ambassador Sondland.

nature bird animal eyes
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

How can an ambassador that is in the loop with all the top government officials never hear of the Biden/Hunter connection to Burisma and Ukraine’s attempt to interfere in Trump’s election?  Does he have his head in the proverbial sand like an ostrich?

He’s spoken with Rudy and Trump and all the other players yet this never came up?  Amazing!  Sondland is a cocky, former supporter of JEB which says a lot.  He probably thinks Trump stole the presidency from JEB. Sondland obviously never watches FOX News or he would have heard of these issues years ago.  How can we have people in such high positions being so clueless?

He probably believes in Russian collusion and is a buddy of Mueller too.  All these guys are in cahoots together. His testimony today is nothing more than a he said, he said, he overheard, he said, and I deduced. This is not evidence to impeach a popular president. Sondland even admitted that Zelensky loves President Trump.  Isn’t that enough to make these diplomats happy?  Apparently not.

But the most damning evidence against impeachment was when Sondland called the president and asked what he wanted from Ukraine.  Trump said, “I want nothing. I want NO quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.”  Boom.  Case closed again.  For Sondland then to say he put two and two together and came up with four–meaning Trump required Zelensky to announce investigations into Biden will begin before releasing aid is a big stretch or he’s bad at math. Sondland went on to say, the aid was not tied to anything, I just presumed it was. That’s a big presumption too.

 

addition black and white black and white chalk
Photo by George Becker on Pexels.com

Trump is allowed to investigate corruption into his 2016 campaign and also to investigate corruption by the Obama administration in Ukraine.  Whether or not it was his condition to release aid to Ukraine is a moot point.  Not impeachable.  A.G. Barr is looking into it anyway with the help of Rudy, I presume, so what’s the big whoop?  It’s all going to come out in the wash soon, despite what the Dems want.

Sondland is definitely a hostile witness to Trump since he comes to his own conclusions which are not favorable to Trump. I get the feeling he voted for Hillary even. But Trump never said anything wrong. The left will spin his testimony as a win for them today, no doubt.  But Sondland came today to contribute to Trump’s impeachment.  He actually thinks Trump was trying to dig up dirt on his opponent, I believe.  Clueless Sondland.  The dirt was already out and has been for some time.

agriculture backyard blur close up
Photo by Lukas on Pexels.com

It’s amazing to me how uninformed all these so-called smart diplomats are. I think they are willfully ignorant.  They’re nothing more than central casting for the Revenge of the Nerds II which is another way of saying Schiff’s Resistance Movement, or as the whistleblower called it, the Coup begins.

Afternoon Session: Assumptions, Disappointment, Blind Opinions But No Claims of Bribery…Next.

 

black and white dark decoration faces
Photo by George Becker on Pexels.com

Ambassador Volker actually said that the reason he didn’t pay any attention to Biden’s video about quid pro quo was because he’s known Biden for years and Biden would never do anything like this.  Wow! This is the biggest “see no evil and hear no evil” I’ve ever seen.  We’re going to go by his opinion of Biden versus what Biden said on video about himself and Obama? The guy’s either blind, deaf, or dumb.  I’m appalled by the level of devotion to the Bidens. What do the Bidens have on everyone?

Volker mentioned “conspiracy theories” several times regarding the Bidens which is exactly what the media calls it. Who the hell is he to tell us what to believe? If there was corruption under the Obama Administration, he’s covering it up.  He’s either involved in a coverup or is vying for a future job at CNN. After all, former Obama officials end up there–Brennan, Clapper, McCabe.

This whole impeachment sham is based on nothing more than a gossip session.  We have to listen to everyone’s recollection of a conversation they had or heard with so and so.  From now on every official working in the government has to watch what he says and to whom he says it.  This is what this ordeal is boiling down to.  This will be the quietest government from now on because people won’t want to go to congress to remember what they said. Trump won’t call anymore heads of state because he knows now that the swamp is listening in and tattling.

Can you imagine if Obama was accused of bribery after one of his calls to heads of state?  The press would be out in arms yelling discrimination and racism.  This is why I feel Trump is the first president to be a victim of reverse racism mainly because he replaced a Black president.  Tough act to follow, apparently.  If he was Black, none of these accusations would ever get past the whistleblower.  In fact, the IG would blow the whistleblower out of his office and probably fire pajama boy and send him home to mommy where he belongs.

Obama and Bush have both held back funds to other countries for various reasons and were never accused of bribery. It’s SOP for the president so we don’t look like pushovers in the eyes of other countries. Obama sent pallets of cash to Iran in the dead of night without approval of congress!  Was that a bribe?  Biden held back a billion in aid to Ukraine until they fired a prosecutor investigating Burmisa.  Was that a bribe?  In fact, the media thought Biden sounded like a tough guy and they laughed. I like the way these so-called honest officials need their lawyers sitting next to them whispering in their ear.  It’s been my experience that if you have nothing to hide, you don’t need a lawyer. They’re hiding something.

Schiff keeps reiterating that Trump held up aid for PERSONAL GAIN to get “dirt” on his opponent, Biden.  First of all, Trump was not worried about running against Biden as Biden hadn’t fared well in either debate. Secondly, we thought getting opposition research was allowed as that’s what Hillary and Obama had done on Trump and no one cared then.  Hmmm.  Amazing. Thirdly, it’s part of Trump’s job due to a treaty with Ukraine to cooperate with the U.S. regarding all corruption, even by a former VP.  No one is above the law. And lastly, the dirt, as the Dems so eloquently call it, was already out there.  Biden incriminates himself in a video. Trump just wanted Ukraine to complete the investigation so that “selling your name and influence” can never be done by a U.S. leader again.  That’s a good thing.

Both witnesses admitted no bribery was committed by Trump or any of his administration. So why are they here?  Morrison admitted Vindman did not come to him regarding his concerns over the phone call but went to others…(whistleblower). The plot thickens. Looks like the Dems are getting hooked on their own fishing line.  Oops! Ouch, that hurts.

selective focus of brown fishing reel
Photo by Brent Keane on Pexels.com

Today’s Hearing: Lots of Inference, Tattletaling, Praising, and Fishing.

 

Image result for images of fishermen catching fish

Again, the Democrats are fishing for something, anything, to hang on Trump.  They ask leading questions and come up empty.  Law Class 101:  Don’t ask a question of your witness unless you already know the answer.  For instance:  Democrat Goldman asked Vindman, “When you met with Ukraine officials after the infamous phone call, did they express any concern for where their aid was?”  Long pause from Vindman while he searches for the appropriate answer and squirms in his seat.  “No, no mention of it.”  Boom.  Case closed.  Why are we continuing this charade?

Vindman reminds me of a chubby Boy Scout in high school that tattletales on the Football Quarterback for doing something “inappropriate” in class–maybe sending a love note to a girl. Trump doesn’t have to use Vindman’s outline of questions when talking to a head of state.  Vindman is not an elected leader.  Vindman has used the words inappropriate and improper in reference to Trump’s call but he also infers a lot into it.  He claims Trump demanded they look into Biden. There was nothing in the transcript that reads demand. Trump has a brain and can ask his own questions. And there was no mention of anything impeachable being spoken.

I suspect Vindman is a Biden supporter, possibly an Obama holdover, that knows a lot about the corruption that they were involved in and, coincidentally, he never objected to that.  Why?  Was he part of the operation and afraid of being implemented?  He got offered a high level job in Ukraine.  Why?  This could be just the tip of the iceberg. And who cares if Pence didn’t attend Zelinsky’s inauguration?  Why is that even mentioned?  That’s not impeachable or evidence to anything impeachable. Trump didn’t want them both out of country at same time, it was learned later but the inference from Ms. Williams made it sound vindictive.

Again this is a witch hunt just a new subject of witch hunt–from Russia to Ukraine. Trump is allowed to investigate corruption in Ukraine during the 2016 election just as Mueller was allowed to investigate Russian corruption in 2016.  Trump is allowed to wonder why Biden held back funds in exchange for a prosecutor being fired–the real quid pro quo.  I thought “No one is above the law, not even candidates for president.” The media continues to report that the Biden/Hunter issue has been investigated and dismissed for no wrong doing.  Really? Not true, as the prosecutor was fired. Any president would wonder.  But since it’s Trump, they dismiss him.

The media is so corrupt itself, I wonder what kind of country we have turned into. I feel like we are living in soviet-style third world country where we aren’t allowed to hear the truth. Again, I say “Thank God for FOX News, Tucker, Hannity, and Ingraham.”  Without their investigative reporters and this handful of congressmen and senators, we’d know nothing.  Also “Thank God for Rush Limbaugh.”

Ms. Williams is not aware of anything pertaining to the Bidens yet she works with Ukraine. We seem to know more than her.  Why is that?  I suspect she’s a feminist and a big Hillary supporter and is undermining the president because she’s pissed that he won the election. I wasn’t impressed with any of her answers, despite that Vindman warned us not to criticize them.  Sorry Vindman, I don’t take advice from you either. I find Vindman to be somewhat of a traitor and a snitch.

This Resistance group is larger than I thought. I’ve never seen so many officials that are not curious about the real corruption that goes on right before their eyes.  It’s amazing.  Here’s their most often said comments:  “I’m not aware” and “Inappropriate” and “Improper.” When asked if they were “Nevertrumpers” they acted like they’d never heard the term.

Vindman refused to answer questions regarding who he told his recollection of the phone call.  Whistleblower comes to mind. Schiff interrupted and the audience groaned.  Schiff said this hearing is not about outing the whistleblower.  But Vindman already testified in private that he did not know the whistleblower. So how could he out him? Red flag alert. Then his lawyer interceded to say he will not answer this question.  This is a total set up and a sham. They’re all in it together to take out Trump and the Democrats are hiding something big from this hearing. I suspect Vindman is the conduit to the whistleblower, and they don’t want that fact exposed.  Vindman has never spoken to Trump and never met him.  Another witness that is out-of-the-loop and wants to be in-the-loop.

The Democrats kissed Boy Scout’s butt making him out to be another war hero and irreproachable. Bottomline is:  Boy Scout Vindman listened in on Trump’s phone call and decided upon himself what was inappropriate or improper and relayed the contents to the whistleblower who met with Schiff and, voila, we finally have “hearsay” grounds for impeachment!  And now this sham of a hearing.  But not one ounce of evidence of bribery (which is their newly-polled buzzword) to impeach Trump on.

If this isn’t a fishing expedition, I don’t know what is. But if the Democrats aren’t careful, they may snag themselves with the hook: Vindman leaked to the partisan, activist whistleblower. We judge people by the company they keep.  If this is his company, all his testimony is not to be believed.  He’s part of the coup.

white boats on body of water
Photo by Matthis Volquardsen on Pexels.com

Impeachment Witnesses: “Heard It Through the Grapevine.”

grapes on vineyard during daytime
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

“Don’tcha know that I heard it through the grapevine
That Ukraine’s aid could be declined
Oh, I heard it through the grapevine
And I’m just about to lose my mind

Honey, honey, yeah
(I heard it through the grapevine)
(Ukraine’s aid could be declined, baby, ooh)

I know a man ain’t supposed to cry
But Marie is willing to try 
Losin’ again would end my life you see
‘Cause it means that much to me
You could have told us yourself
But you confided with someone else
Instead I heard it through the grapevine
That Ukraine’s aid could be declined.”

And this is why the diplomats have their panties in a wad because they weren’t privy to Trump’s Ukraine policy plans. Trump never called them.  So far all the witnesses have no first hand knowledge of anything regarding Trump’s phone call with Ukraine.  Just hearsay from a friend of a friend of a colleague. So why do we have to continue this charade?  Because Schiff and Nancy are both crazy.

Schiff admitted he’s part of the Resistance (started by Hillary) and wants to send this charlatan back to his golden throne. Charlatan is a conman, a fake, an imposter. And we all know what he means by golden throne. I’m sure he wasn’t referring to a King’s throne. He’s a nasty man.  So this is what they’ll try to impeach Trump on now–being an imposter?

Quid pro quo didn’t work, bribery was hard to explain without stumbling on your words so now it’s going to be “imposter in the White House.” A charlatan because he stole the election from Hillary.  They must sit around coming up with their next buzzword of the week for impeachment.

Impeachment is not the answer to an election that doesn’t go your way, Nancy. There has to be a reason for impeachment. Nancy says Trump knows that he is an imposter in the White House. She also says what Trump has done is worse than Nixon.  She needs to go back to history class.  Trump hasn’t been involved in a burglary of the DNC nor destroying evidence.  That would be Hillary.  Trump was just making a standard phone call to another head of state to congratulate him on his election and other “small talk” about our 2016 election and interference from Ukraine–not Russia. So you see, everything they’re guilty of, they try to pin on Trump like Nunes said on Mark Levine’s show.

This is a trap they’re setting up for Trump when asking him to come in under oath. This in not a court of law with an impartial judge, it’s a political lynching. If he makes one small misstep (which he could easily do), they’ll charge him with lying under oath to congress. I know you’re innocent Trump, but don’t fall for this.  They’re setting you up.  None of their lying witnesses will get charged with lying under oath, just you will.

It’s true that the Democrats are in search of their next Watergate, it just isn’t there. There’s no there, there, as Strzok once said.  I feel sorry for Trump that he has to go through this circus. I also feel sorry for our country that we have to endure this manufactured ordeal and waste of money.

Why won’t one of our former men in power like George W. Bush come forward and stand up for Trump and demand that this charade come to an end?  Why can’t someone like this come forward?  Or is he part of the Nevertrumpers and wants him out too?  Thank God A.G. Barr is standing up for Trump, but now the left wants him impeached. I guess we have a party of cowards except for a handful of congressmen and senators which I’m thankful for. I keep waiting for the grownups to come home as this teenage party is out of control. 

people partying close up photography
Photo by Giorgio Paradisi on Pexels.com

 

Can’t believe we have to listen to more evidence heard through the grapevine this week.  Get me off this crazy train that never ends.

close up engine landscape locomotive
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Is Anyone Else Sick of People Telling Us Their Diet or Food Restrictions?

 

sharing food
Photo by fauxels on Pexels.com

Since when do we all have to know what everyone else eats?  Why can’t they go to a party and politely not eat what isn’t on their diet?  Why do they feel a need to tell everyone? For instance, they’ll say, “I’m a vegan, I’m a vegetarian, I’m sugar free, I’m gluten free.”  Or the latest a Keto Diet. Who cares.  Just take or eat what you like and not put everyone else out.

My biggest pet peeve is people in restaurants having the poor waiter return a plate of food that has something on it that they don’t eat.  It’s rude!  I feel like these types of people like controlling others with their dietary needs. It’s a control issue.  If you’re a vegan, for whatever dumb reason, just order veggies and shut the hell up.  Don’t ask the chef to create a meal just for you.  I notice lots of menus now have a vegan or gluten free entree.  But that doesn’t stop these self-absorbed, self-centered people from demanding something else from the chef. They love putting people out for some odd reason.

In the old days, people had more manners.  As kids we were taught to eat everything on the plate before we could leave the table. Now parents are allowing their kids to pick at their food and eat whatever they like on their plate.  This is where this rudeness begins, in the home. So when they become adults they feel entitled to make demands on their chef or their host at a dinner party.  It’s not cool!  Stop it!  You’re being rude.

If you don’t like what’s being served just take what you do like or can eat but please, please, don’t tell the rest of the guests what your dietary needs are.  We don’t care nor do we need to know. Some things are better left unsaid.  Just saying.

I sometimes watch the Below Deck reality show and am appalled by the rudeness of the guests that return food to the chef onboard to re-cook or make them something special.  Just about every episode has one or more of these rude people onboard–It’s too cold, it’s too rare, it’s too welldone, it’s not on my approved list, it’s too spicy.  But recently a group of happy women came onboard that loved everything that was served and never sent anything back to the kitchen.  They ate diary, carbs, gluten, meat, fishy fish, eggs, even cow’s tongue without one complaint and shared an abundance of laughs throughout the episode. They had no food restrictions which made them happier people. It was refreshing.

Be happy for whatever you’re served and don’t complain.  If there were more people like this group of women, the world would definitely be a better place.  There’s an old saying that my mother taught me,”If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.”  That pertains to eating in a restaurant, unless there’s broken glass in your meal, of course. But these people who feel the need to return food to the chef and embarrass him, I have no use for.

If you’re a vegan and are invited to someone’s house for Thanksgiving where there will undoubtedly be butter, turkey, eggs, and creamy side dishes; just grin and bear it for one evening.  It won’t kill you.  Show some manners for once in your life and be appreciative that you were invited. Bring a vegan side dish or cake or pie if you must, but don’t tell everyone at the table.  They don’t care about your mission to stop cruelty to animals by not eating meat and dairy. Good for you but keep it to yourself.

selective focus photo of red turkey head
Photo by Magda Ehlers on Pexels.com

One of my sons recently tried to pull this crap on me saying he doesn’t eat white bread any longer.  I said, “Well, I bought this bread especially for your visit, and you’ll just have to eat it or go without. I’m not making another trip to the store.” Tough love, but I still love him. He ate it. He shouldn’t have voiced his disapproval but rather just broke his eating rules for one day.  That’s the way I was taught. Why did he feel the need to say anything?  Why does anyone feel the need to say anything?  It’s not right. Just shut up and eat! 

person holding bread
Photo by Buenosia Carol on Pexels.com

 

None of the Current Candidates Can Beat Trump…Like a Drum.

 

Image result for images of native american playing drum

 

The Natives must be getting restless as they’re turning out a new candidate every couple of days now, flooding the field with unknown, late-to-the-party candidates to save the country from the big bad meanie Trump.  I still think they’re holding an ace up their sleeves named Michelle My Belle.  Obama and Soros aren’t going to let two-time loser Biden lose it again–to Trump.  They’re having a pow-wow right now as we sit here.

Of course, Michelle doesn’t have the chops to run a country for just being a First Lady unless we need the food police or vegetable growing tips BUT she is beloved by the left and Obama could get his paws back in the White House and run it for her.  Just like Bill tried to do with Hillary.  No doubt in my mind. This may be their plan all along if Impeachment fails.  They’ll go to Plan G.  But we have an ace up our sleeve too named A.G. Barr and Company.  When their reports finally come out, we’ll be dealing with a whole new scenario.

Someone recently told me the Barr Team may be holding back until after the election because if indictments start to flow against the left’s heros like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Ohr, Nellie, Steele, Strzok and the office lover, and many others it will energize the Independents to the polls to vote Trump out in retaliation.  That would be bad. The indictments would have the reverse effect on America as some gullibles will be gobsmacked. Their sheltered minds won’t be able to comprehend it, as they’ve been lied to for three years by the Democrat news media. No telling how they would react, most likely going to the streets to protest violently but would a civil war be ignited? This is probably the fear of our Attorney General.

But should we be running our country out of fear or according to the Constitution and Rule of Law?  Hopefully, the latter. Maybe if Barr just indicted a couple of these dirty rotten scoundrels but not the whole lot of them, we could smoke the peace pipe until after the election then let the indictment floodgates open.

abstract art clear cold
Photo by Artur Roman on Pexels.com

But seriously, the Democrats are scared they’ll lose in 2020 as the economy is still roaring and Trump is still winning.  None of this looks good for a challenger of Trump. What will they be challenging him on?  They may just go back to their standard old “climate change denier” and “pro choice denier”  and now “DACA denier” has emerged lately.  When in doubt, go back to those tired out old liberal issues. Even though Trump tried to get a bill that helped DACA but was turned down by the selfish Democrats who only care about not giving Trump a win.  Similar to why USMCA won’t get passed while Pelosi is Speaker.

As it stands now, no one can beat Trump like a drum not even Pocahontas and she’s got Native heritage on her side.  And this is the left’s biggest fear, thus, why they’re trying to impeach him first. But could there be a squaw out there waiting in the teepees that could beat Trump like a drum?  Stay tuned.

Image result for pictures of native american beating a drum