It’s Clear Now Why Dems Want/Need Impeachment.

 

selective focus photography of pink and black framed eyeglasses
Photo by Designecologist on Pexels.com

After last night’s awful Democrat Presidential Debate, I can see clearly now why the Democrats are pushing for impeachment. What they have put on stage to possibly go up against Trump ranged from pathetic to embarrassing and I’m being kind.  The biased moderators were a joke, too.  Four women (not one male) asked loaded, leading, and, frankly, untruthful premises to questions of the candidates.

For instance, the first question out of the gate was from Rachel Madcow: “bombshell testimony from Sondland proves that Trump withheld military aid from Ukraine…etc.” and she asked Warren if she’ll be able to vote for his impeachment.  This was the impetus for many cruel attacks on Trump ranging from: a criminal living in the White House, most corrupt president in modern history, pathological liar, fragile ego, makes decisions based on his next tweet, embraced thugs, no idea what he’s doing, repugnant and appalling, impeachable conduct and abuse of power, started crisis at border, caging children,  greatest threat to our national security, putting our country in worse financial condition daily, engaged in corruption, violated the emoluments clause, indicted himself, thinks he’s above the law, and has told over 10,000 lies.  All lies. It’s amazing our country has lasted three years under Trump with all this lawlessness and incompetence.

All the candidates claim they did “not come from money” but they actually weren’t even middle class which most Americans are proud to admit.  They admit to being lower class. Daughters of janitors and single working moms, living in a two-bedroom house with four children, sleeping in the garage, eating food from cans; but, seriously, yet they were able to attend ivy league universities.  How is that?  They say only the rich can go to good colleges and get good healthcare, yet they claim they came from rags.  “Molested by uncles” in reference to abortion flowed from Warren’s tongue just a little too easy, making me cringe.  What kind of uncles did she know? Somewhere along the line they gamed the system which leads me to believe they weren’t honest or really played the minority and/or LBGT cards.

Out of ten candidates only two sounded sane: Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang, but we don’t want their radical policies.  The rest were even more radical: One rich climate change nut, one ex-prosecutor who wants to keep prosecuting, one Pelosi protege, one communist, one corporation-hater, a gay guy that doesn’t golf, a vegan, pot-smoking Rhodes Scholar, and a partridge in a pear tree.  That leaves us with Biden.  I actually felt for him everytime he was asked a question.  He looked nervous, ashamed, and out of his league. But I did like the way he stood up to Booker saying that he didn’t think marijuana should be legalized nationally.  Good for him.

Image result for images of a partridge in a pear tree

Tulsi claimed “Bush-Clinton-Trump-Regime-change-wars” yet Trump hasn’t gone to war.  And she conveniently left out Obama’s Benghazi. I thought that was very telling.  She conversely left out Trump when saying that it is good to meet with dictators and credited Reagan and other presidents. Not one candidate gave Trump credit for anything he’s accomplished and the moderators avoided questions on the great economy.  Climate change, Voter Suppression, White Supremacy, Metoo movement were big topics.  Really?  Those are the biggest problems America faces?  What happened to immigration reform, trade tariffs, USMCA, nuclear proliferation, border security, homeless problem, sanctuary cities, and school security?

Bernie claimed we’ve only got eight years left before cities will go under water. Bernie’s been drinking the AOC Kool Aid. Biden thinks Metoo movement is violence against women. It’s a gigantic issue!   Someone needs to tell him it’s “sexual harassment in the workplace” not violence. Boot-a-judge thinks Trump is building moats filled with alligators. And Booker claims congress is smoking pot. That I may agree with. Kamala even admitted to it.

All in all, I can see clearly why the Dems need to impeach Trump as these candidates are Not Ready For Prime Time, and they know it.

Clueless Ambassador Sondland.

nature bird animal eyes
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

How can an ambassador that is in the loop with all the top government officials never hear of the Biden/Hunter connection to Burisma and Ukraine’s attempt to interfere in Trump’s election?  Does he have his head in the proverbial sand like an ostrich?

He’s spoken with Rudy and Trump and all the other players yet this never came up?  Amazing!  Sondland is a cocky, former supporter of JEB which says a lot.  He probably thinks Trump stole the presidency from JEB. Sondland obviously never watches FOX News or he would have heard of these issues years ago.  How can we have people in such high positions being so clueless?

He probably believes in Russian collusion and is a buddy of Mueller too.  All these guys are in cahoots together. His testimony today is nothing more than a he said, he said, he overheard, he said, and I deduced. This is not evidence to impeach a popular president. Sondland even admitted that Zelensky loves President Trump.  Isn’t that enough to make these diplomats happy?  Apparently not.

But the most damning evidence against impeachment was when Sondland called the president and asked what he wanted from Ukraine.  Trump said, “I want nothing. I want NO quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.”  Boom.  Case closed again.  For Sondland then to say he put two and two together and came up with four–meaning Trump required Zelensky to announce investigations into Biden will begin before releasing aid is a big stretch or he’s bad at math. Sondland went on to say, the aid was not tied to anything, I just presumed it was. That’s a big presumption too.

 

addition black and white black and white chalk
Photo by George Becker on Pexels.com

Trump is allowed to investigate corruption into his 2016 campaign and also to investigate corruption by the Obama administration in Ukraine.  Whether or not it was his condition to release aid to Ukraine is a moot point.  Not impeachable.  A.G. Barr is looking into it anyway with the help of Rudy, I presume, so what’s the big whoop?  It’s all going to come out in the wash soon, despite what the Dems want.

Sondland is definitely a hostile witness to Trump since he comes to his own conclusions which are not favorable to Trump. I get the feeling he voted for Hillary even. But Trump never said anything wrong. The left will spin his testimony as a win for them today, no doubt.  But Sondland came today to contribute to Trump’s impeachment.  He actually thinks Trump was trying to dig up dirt on his opponent, I believe.  Clueless Sondland.  The dirt was already out and has been for some time.

agriculture backyard blur close up
Photo by Lukas on Pexels.com

It’s amazing to me how uninformed all these so-called smart diplomats are. I think they are willfully ignorant.  They’re nothing more than central casting for the Revenge of the Nerds II which is another way of saying Schiff’s Resistance Movement, or as the whistleblower called it, the Coup begins.

Afternoon Session: Assumptions, Disappointment, Blind Opinions But No Claims of Bribery…Next.

 

black and white dark decoration faces
Photo by George Becker on Pexels.com

Ambassador Volker actually said that the reason he didn’t pay any attention to Biden’s video about quid pro quo was because he’s known Biden for years and Biden would never do anything like this.  Wow! This is the biggest “see no evil and hear no evil” I’ve ever seen.  We’re going to go by his opinion of Biden versus what Biden said on video about himself and Obama? The guy’s either blind, deaf, or dumb.  I’m appalled by the level of devotion to the Bidens. What do the Bidens have on everyone?

Volker mentioned “conspiracy theories” several times regarding the Bidens which is exactly what the media calls it. Who the hell is he to tell us what to believe? If there was corruption under the Obama Administration, he’s covering it up.  He’s either involved in a coverup or is vying for a future job at CNN. After all, former Obama officials end up there–Brennan, Clapper, McCabe.

This whole impeachment sham is based on nothing more than a gossip session.  We have to listen to everyone’s recollection of a conversation they had or heard with so and so.  From now on every official working in the government has to watch what he says and to whom he says it.  This is what this ordeal is boiling down to.  This will be the quietest government from now on because people won’t want to go to congress to remember what they said. Trump won’t call anymore heads of state because he knows now that the swamp is listening in and tattling.

Can you imagine if Obama was accused of bribery after one of his calls to heads of state?  The press would be out in arms yelling discrimination and racism.  This is why I feel Trump is the first president to be a victim of reverse racism mainly because he replaced a Black president.  Tough act to follow, apparently.  If he was Black, none of these accusations would ever get past the whistleblower.  In fact, the IG would blow the whistleblower out of his office and probably fire pajama boy and send him home to mommy where he belongs.

Obama and Bush have both held back funds to other countries for various reasons and were never accused of bribery. It’s SOP for the president so we don’t look like pushovers in the eyes of other countries. Obama sent pallets of cash to Iran in the dead of night without approval of congress!  Was that a bribe?  Biden held back a billion in aid to Ukraine until they fired a prosecutor investigating Burmisa.  Was that a bribe?  In fact, the media thought Biden sounded like a tough guy and they laughed. I like the way these so-called honest officials need their lawyers sitting next to them whispering in their ear.  It’s been my experience that if you have nothing to hide, you don’t need a lawyer. They’re hiding something.

Schiff keeps reiterating that Trump held up aid for PERSONAL GAIN to get “dirt” on his opponent, Biden.  First of all, Trump was not worried about running against Biden as Biden hadn’t fared well in either debate. Secondly, we thought getting opposition research was allowed as that’s what Hillary and Obama had done on Trump and no one cared then.  Hmmm.  Amazing. Thirdly, it’s part of Trump’s job due to a treaty with Ukraine to cooperate with the U.S. regarding all corruption, even by a former VP.  No one is above the law. And lastly, the dirt, as the Dems so eloquently call it, was already out there.  Biden incriminates himself in a video. Trump just wanted Ukraine to complete the investigation so that “selling your name and influence” can never be done by a U.S. leader again.  That’s a good thing.

Both witnesses admitted no bribery was committed by Trump or any of his administration. So why are they here?  Morrison admitted Vindman did not come to him regarding his concerns over the phone call but went to others…(whistleblower). The plot thickens. Looks like the Dems are getting hooked on their own fishing line.  Oops! Ouch, that hurts.

selective focus of brown fishing reel
Photo by Brent Keane on Pexels.com

Today’s Hearing: Lots of Inference, Tattletaling, Praising, and Fishing.

 

Image result for images of fishermen catching fish

Again, the Democrats are fishing for something, anything, to hang on Trump.  They ask leading questions and come up empty.  Law Class 101:  Don’t ask a question of your witness unless you already know the answer.  For instance:  Democrat Goldman asked Vindman, “When you met with Ukraine officials after the infamous phone call, did they express any concern for where their aid was?”  Long pause from Vindman while he searches for the appropriate answer and squirms in his seat.  “No, no mention of it.”  Boom.  Case closed.  Why are we continuing this charade?

Vindman reminds me of a chubby Boy Scout in high school that tattletales on the Football Quarterback for doing something “inappropriate” in class–maybe sending a love note to a girl. Trump doesn’t have to use Vindman’s outline of questions when talking to a head of state.  Vindman is not an elected leader.  Vindman has used the words inappropriate and improper in reference to Trump’s call but he also infers a lot into it.  He claims Trump demanded they look into Biden. There was nothing in the transcript that reads demand. Trump has a brain and can ask his own questions. And there was no mention of anything impeachable being spoken.

I suspect Vindman is a Biden supporter, possibly an Obama holdover, that knows a lot about the corruption that they were involved in and, coincidentally, he never objected to that.  Why?  Was he part of the operation and afraid of being implemented?  He got offered a high level job in Ukraine.  Why?  This could be just the tip of the iceberg. And who cares if Pence didn’t attend Zelinsky’s inauguration?  Why is that even mentioned?  That’s not impeachable or evidence to anything impeachable. Trump didn’t want them both out of country at same time, it was learned later but the inference from Ms. Williams made it sound vindictive.

Again this is a witch hunt just a new subject of witch hunt–from Russia to Ukraine. Trump is allowed to investigate corruption in Ukraine during the 2016 election just as Mueller was allowed to investigate Russian corruption in 2016.  Trump is allowed to wonder why Biden held back funds in exchange for a prosecutor being fired–the real quid pro quo.  I thought “No one is above the law, not even candidates for president.” The media continues to report that the Biden/Hunter issue has been investigated and dismissed for no wrong doing.  Really? Not true, as the prosecutor was fired. Any president would wonder.  But since it’s Trump, they dismiss him.

The media is so corrupt itself, I wonder what kind of country we have turned into. I feel like we are living in soviet-style third world country where we aren’t allowed to hear the truth. Again, I say “Thank God for FOX News, Tucker, Hannity, and Ingraham.”  Without their investigative reporters and this handful of congressmen and senators, we’d know nothing.  Also “Thank God for Rush Limbaugh.”

Ms. Williams is not aware of anything pertaining to the Bidens yet she works with Ukraine. We seem to know more than her.  Why is that?  I suspect she’s a feminist and a big Hillary supporter and is undermining the president because she’s pissed that he won the election. I wasn’t impressed with any of her answers, despite that Vindman warned us not to criticize them.  Sorry Vindman, I don’t take advice from you either. I find Vindman to be somewhat of a traitor and a snitch.

This Resistance group is larger than I thought. I’ve never seen so many officials that are not curious about the real corruption that goes on right before their eyes.  It’s amazing.  Here’s their most often said comments:  “I’m not aware” and “Inappropriate” and “Improper.” When asked if they were “Nevertrumpers” they acted like they’d never heard the term.

Vindman refused to answer questions regarding who he told his recollection of the phone call.  Whistleblower comes to mind. Schiff interrupted and the audience groaned.  Schiff said this hearing is not about outing the whistleblower.  But Vindman already testified in private that he did not know the whistleblower. So how could he out him? Red flag alert. Then his lawyer interceded to say he will not answer this question.  This is a total set up and a sham. They’re all in it together to take out Trump and the Democrats are hiding something big from this hearing. I suspect Vindman is the conduit to the whistleblower, and they don’t want that fact exposed.  Vindman has never spoken to Trump and never met him.  Another witness that is out-of-the-loop and wants to be in-the-loop.

The Democrats kissed Boy Scout’s butt making him out to be another war hero and irreproachable. Bottomline is:  Boy Scout Vindman listened in on Trump’s phone call and decided upon himself what was inappropriate or improper and relayed the contents to the whistleblower who met with Schiff and, voila, we finally have “hearsay” grounds for impeachment!  And now this sham of a hearing.  But not one ounce of evidence of bribery (which is their newly-polled buzzword) to impeach Trump on.

If this isn’t a fishing expedition, I don’t know what is. But if the Democrats aren’t careful, they may snag themselves with the hook: Vindman leaked to the partisan, activist whistleblower. We judge people by the company they keep.  If this is his company, all his testimony is not to be believed.  He’s part of the coup.

white boats on body of water
Photo by Matthis Volquardsen on Pexels.com

Impeachment Witnesses: “Heard It Through the Grapevine.”

grapes on vineyard during daytime
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

“Don’tcha know that I heard it through the grapevine
That Ukraine’s aid could be declined
Oh, I heard it through the grapevine
And I’m just about to lose my mind

Honey, honey, yeah
(I heard it through the grapevine)
(Ukraine’s aid could be declined, baby, ooh)

I know a man ain’t supposed to cry
But Marie is willing to try 
Losin’ again would end my life you see
‘Cause it means that much to me
You could have told us yourself
But you confided with someone else
Instead I heard it through the grapevine
That Ukraine’s aid could be declined.”

And this is why the diplomats have their panties in a wad because they weren’t privy to Trump’s Ukraine policy plans. Trump never called them.  So far all the witnesses have no first hand knowledge of anything regarding Trump’s phone call with Ukraine.  Just hearsay from a friend of a friend of a colleague. So why do we have to continue this charade?  Because Schiff and Nancy are both crazy.

Schiff admitted he’s part of the Resistance (started by Hillary) and wants to send this charlatan back to his golden throne. Charlatan is a conman, a fake, an imposter. And we all know what he means by golden throne. I’m sure he wasn’t referring to a King’s throne. He’s a nasty man.  So this is what they’ll try to impeach Trump on now–being an imposter?

Quid pro quo didn’t work, bribery was hard to explain without stumbling on your words so now it’s going to be “imposter in the White House.” A charlatan because he stole the election from Hillary.  They must sit around coming up with their next buzzword of the week for impeachment.

Impeachment is not the answer to an election that doesn’t go your way, Nancy. There has to be a reason for impeachment. Nancy says Trump knows that he is an imposter in the White House. She also says what Trump has done is worse than Nixon.  She needs to go back to history class.  Trump hasn’t been involved in a burglary of the DNC nor destroying evidence.  That would be Hillary.  Trump was just making a standard phone call to another head of state to congratulate him on his election and other “small talk” about our 2016 election and interference from Ukraine–not Russia. So you see, everything they’re guilty of, they try to pin on Trump like Nunes said on Mark Levine’s show.

This is a trap they’re setting up for Trump when asking him to come in under oath. This in not a court of law with an impartial judge, it’s a political lynching. If he makes one small misstep (which he could easily do), they’ll charge him with lying under oath to congress. I know you’re innocent Trump, but don’t fall for this.  They’re setting you up.  None of their lying witnesses will get charged with lying under oath, just you will.

It’s true that the Democrats are in search of their next Watergate, it just isn’t there. There’s no there, there, as Strzok once said.  I feel sorry for Trump that he has to go through this circus. I also feel sorry for our country that we have to endure this manufactured ordeal and waste of money.

Why won’t one of our former men in power like George W. Bush come forward and stand up for Trump and demand that this charade come to an end?  Why can’t someone like this come forward?  Or is he part of the Nevertrumpers and wants him out too?  Thank God A.G. Barr is standing up for Trump, but now the left wants him impeached. I guess we have a party of cowards except for a handful of congressmen and senators which I’m thankful for. I keep waiting for the grownups to come home as this teenage party is out of control. 

people partying close up photography
Photo by Giorgio Paradisi on Pexels.com

 

Can’t believe we have to listen to more evidence heard through the grapevine this week.  Get me off this crazy train that never ends.

close up engine landscape locomotive
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Is Anyone Else Sick of People Telling Us Their Diet or Food Restrictions?

 

sharing food
Photo by fauxels on Pexels.com

Since when do we all have to know what everyone else eats?  Why can’t they go to a party and politely not eat what isn’t on their diet?  Why do they feel a need to tell everyone? For instance, they’ll say, “I’m a vegan, I’m a vegetarian, I’m sugar free, I’m gluten free.”  Or the latest a Keto Diet. Who cares.  Just take or eat what you like and not put everyone else out.

My biggest pet peeve is people in restaurants having the poor waiter return a plate of food that has something on it that they don’t eat.  It’s rude!  I feel like these types of people like controlling others with their dietary needs. It’s a control issue.  If you’re a vegan, for whatever dumb reason, just order veggies and shut the hell up.  Don’t ask the chef to create a meal just for you.  I notice lots of menus now have a vegan or gluten free entree.  But that doesn’t stop these self-absorbed, self-centered people from demanding something else from the chef. They love putting people out for some odd reason.

In the old days, people had more manners.  As kids we were taught to eat everything on the plate before we could leave the table. Now parents are allowing their kids to pick at their food and eat whatever they like on their plate.  This is where this rudeness begins, in the home. So when they become adults they feel entitled to make demands on their chef or their host at a dinner party.  It’s not cool!  Stop it!  You’re being rude.

If you don’t like what’s being served just take what you do like or can eat but please, please, don’t tell the rest of the guests what your dietary needs are.  We don’t care nor do we need to know. Some things are better left unsaid.  Just saying.

I sometimes watch the Below Deck reality show and am appalled by the rudeness of the guests that return food to the chef onboard to re-cook or make them something special.  Just about every episode has one or more of these rude people onboard–It’s too cold, it’s too rare, it’s too welldone, it’s not on my approved list, it’s too spicy.  But recently a group of happy women came onboard that loved everything that was served and never sent anything back to the kitchen.  They ate diary, carbs, gluten, meat, fishy fish, eggs, even cow’s tongue without one complaint and shared an abundance of laughs throughout the episode. They had no food restrictions which made them happier people. It was refreshing.

Be happy for whatever you’re served and don’t complain.  If there were more people like this group of women, the world would definitely be a better place.  There’s an old saying that my mother taught me,”If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.”  That pertains to eating in a restaurant, unless there’s broken glass in your meal, of course. But these people who feel the need to return food to the chef and embarrass him, I have no use for.

If you’re a vegan and are invited to someone’s house for Thanksgiving where there will undoubtedly be butter, turkey, eggs, and creamy side dishes; just grin and bear it for one evening.  It won’t kill you.  Show some manners for once in your life and be appreciative that you were invited. Bring a vegan side dish or cake or pie if you must, but don’t tell everyone at the table.  They don’t care about your mission to stop cruelty to animals by not eating meat and dairy. Good for you but keep it to yourself.

selective focus photo of red turkey head
Photo by Magda Ehlers on Pexels.com

One of my sons recently tried to pull this crap on me saying he doesn’t eat white bread any longer.  I said, “Well, I bought this bread especially for your visit, and you’ll just have to eat it or go without. I’m not making another trip to the store.” Tough love, but I still love him. He ate it. He shouldn’t have voiced his disapproval but rather just broke his eating rules for one day.  That’s the way I was taught. Why did he feel the need to say anything?  Why does anyone feel the need to say anything?  It’s not right. Just shut up and eat! 

person holding bread
Photo by Buenosia Carol on Pexels.com

 

None of the Current Candidates Can Beat Trump…Like a Drum.

 

Image result for images of native american playing drum

 

The Natives must be getting restless as they’re turning out a new candidate every couple of days now, flooding the field with unknown, late-to-the-party candidates to save the country from the big bad meanie Trump.  I still think they’re holding an ace up their sleeves named Michelle My Belle.  Obama and Soros aren’t going to let two-time loser Biden lose it again–to Trump.  They’re having a pow-wow right now as we sit here.

Of course, Michelle doesn’t have the chops to run a country for just being a First Lady unless we need the food police or vegetable growing tips BUT she is beloved by the left and Obama could get his paws back in the White House and run it for her.  Just like Bill tried to do with Hillary.  No doubt in my mind. This may be their plan all along if Impeachment fails.  They’ll go to Plan G.  But we have an ace up our sleeve too named A.G. Barr and Company.  When their reports finally come out, we’ll be dealing with a whole new scenario.

Someone recently told me the Barr Team may be holding back until after the election because if indictments start to flow against the left’s heros like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Ohr, Nellie, Steele, Strzok and the office lover, and many others it will energize the Independents to the polls to vote Trump out in retaliation.  That would be bad. The indictments would have the reverse effect on America as some gullibles will be gobsmacked. Their sheltered minds won’t be able to comprehend it, as they’ve been lied to for three years by the Democrat news media. No telling how they would react, most likely going to the streets to protest violently but would a civil war be ignited? This is probably the fear of our Attorney General.

But should we be running our country out of fear or according to the Constitution and Rule of Law?  Hopefully, the latter. Maybe if Barr just indicted a couple of these dirty rotten scoundrels but not the whole lot of them, we could smoke the peace pipe until after the election then let the indictment floodgates open.

abstract art clear cold
Photo by Artur Roman on Pexels.com

But seriously, the Democrats are scared they’ll lose in 2020 as the economy is still roaring and Trump is still winning.  None of this looks good for a challenger of Trump. What will they be challenging him on?  They may just go back to their standard old “climate change denier” and “pro choice denier”  and now “DACA denier” has emerged lately.  When in doubt, go back to those tired out old liberal issues. Even though Trump tried to get a bill that helped DACA but was turned down by the selfish Democrats who only care about not giving Trump a win.  Similar to why USMCA won’t get passed while Pelosi is Speaker.

As it stands now, no one can beat Trump like a drum not even Pocahontas and she’s got Native heritage on her side.  And this is the left’s biggest fear, thus, why they’re trying to impeach him first. But could there be a squaw out there waiting in the teepees that could beat Trump like a drum?  Stay tuned.

Image result for pictures of native american beating a drum

Yovanovitch May Have Been Fired But…She’s Still Alive!

 

black and gray alligator on body of water
Photo by Flickr on Pexels.com

 

Unlike poor Ambassador Christopher Stevens under Hillary’s and Obama’s watch.  Chris’s family only wishes he was still alive. His family wishes he had just gotten fired. His family wishes he was only insulted by the president.  Apparently getting fired and insulted is worse now than getting murdered according to Marie, the new darling of the left, and the Impeachment Panel.  Her bruised ego is so big she feels violated by Trump’s decision to fire her.  She’s ready to break out those crocodile tears on cue.  And Chris Wallace, we do have a heart, despite what you just insinuated: we don’t, if we aren’t falling for this lady’s sad sack story.

At 9:40 p.m., September 11, members of Ansar al-Sharia attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.[1][2] Stevens was the first U.S. ambassador killed in the line of duty since 1979.[3] At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.  Wikipedia

Notice how the CIA said it was started by a protest.  The Deep State was alive and well even back then. Christopher Stevens requested security 600 times from Hillary but went ignored. They requested the military come in on the TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY of 9-11 during a TERRORIST ATTACK but military was told to stand down by Obama. A terror attack didn’t fit the narrative for Obama’s reelection. Nothing like this happened to this lady being interviewed today as part of an impeachment query. She’s just a disgruntled employee and has no first hand knowledge of Trump’s call to Ukraine. Why is she even here?  Is this the best they got? She should be in the Personnel Department filing a grievance.  She behaved like a demure, shrinking violet until they mentioned Trump, then she became visibly miffed.

She actually felt her life was in imminent danger from being told to leave the country ASAP? Please!  Sounds more like the prologue to her imminent novel.  It’s not the Republicans that take out individuals that go against them.  It’s the Clinton Machine that does.  Trump had no reason to fire her other than she was suspected of undermining him overseas and has connections to Soros and is part of the Hate Trump Train.  Whether she was or not, it’s up to the president to protect his reputation overseas and drain the swamp.

She’s another Nevertrumper and now it seems a NeverFoxNewser.  She was tied to the Obama Administration and probably a Hillary donor. She has the arrogant demeanor of Lois Lerner.  She can write a book now about her horrific, covert operation in Ukraine dodging sniper fire and Hollywood can pick it up and make another phony movie. She can make Trump the antagonist in her novel that fired her for no good reason.

Schiffwreck is trying to get her to cry on camera to help their case.  Ridiculous.  She’s there to expose wrongdoing and the president is intimidating a witness. When Trump tweets, he’s defending himself which is under assault, not intimidating a witness. If Schiff was so worried about “witness tampering,” why did he read Trump’s tweet to her?  He’s intimidating her–not Trump. Schiff also treated the female member of the Republican panel very sexist–continuously cut her off even gaveling her yet the press calls Trump a sexist?  Schiff hates women.  He’s using this disgruntled employee as a sympathetic pawn in his impeachment sham like they used activist Dr. Ford in their Kavanaugh smear.  Women should be smarter than this and not be used. What a terrible legacy Marie has given to the end of her ambassador career.

This is a political hearing not a court of law. This sham is so one sided that Republican members are forbidden to be heard and, frankly, are being treated rudely. Trump wanted to step in to help the Republicans on the panel.  Note to Trump: Let these Democrats hang themselves. No need to hold the rope. These dirty rotten scoundrels are looking for anything now, anything at all, to booster their impeachment case. Let Jordan, Nunes, Radcliffe, and the tough female handle it.  They’re doing a good job.

This is the biggest witch hunt with the widest cast net that I’ve ever seen in American history. Now Roger Stone has been found guilty for lying by a D.C. jury.  Shocker.  Trump needs to pardon him.  There’s no way he would have been arrested but for being on Trump’s campaign.  Not fair.  None of the lying Democrats including Schiffwreck, Comey, or McCabe have even been indicted.  It’s all a set up and a sham, and I hope America can see through this.

person throwing fish net while standing on boat
Photo by Quang Nguyen Vinh on Pexels.com

Shame on Marie Yovanovitch for allowing herself to be part of this sham. She was supposed to be a strong woman.  She’s not that strong.  She’ll be the darling of the left for her fifteen minutes of fame and then they’ll dump her in a New York minute as soon as they see she didn’t help.  She’ll be named Person of the Year by Time Magazine, do all the talk shows including The View, then go teach at a university.   I hate to see another hate-filled teacher indoctrinating our youth against the president, but she’ll fit in nicely.

KEEP DRAINING THAT SWAMP, TRUMP! IT’S GETTING SLIMEIER.   

The Impeachment Sham Begins…

 

puppies in bowl
Photo by sergio souza on Pexels.com

“Kent and Taylor,” two smug, pro-Ukraine diplomats, sounding more like an investment firm or a men’s formalwear boutique, sat there bragging about how more experienced they are than the president and how “concerned” they are for Ukraine. It was a boring, snoozefest.  The bowtied one reminded me of Strzok with his smirks and expressions. They’re only there to take out the president. Their testimony was essentially about the president’s policies that they didn’t agree with. This is an embarrassment to our country and another waste of money.  It will be dead on arrival in the Senate. We have to legitimize impeachment by going through an orchestrated, phony punishment-in-search-of-a-crime PISOAC Hearing. If it wasn’t so sad, it would be laughable; but it’s not fair nor is it right.  It’s a one-sided attack on the president led by bug-eyed Schiff and will fall flat like the Kavanaugh hearing leaving more egg on the Democrats’ faces.

adult black pug
Photo by Charles on Pexels.com

The Mueller Probe was an investigation-in-search-of-a-crime, now we have PISOAC. The left has thrown everything but the kitchen sink at Trump, but he’s still standing. Why?  Because he hasn’t done “something” as DeNiro calls it. I do worry, however, that this impeachment sham will tarnish his next election with the Independents who are mostly gullibles. They don’t have time to keep up on the latest news and probably just get snippets off the radio, the internet, or late night comedy.  These snippets are always left leaning and, consequently, can influence a voter in the wrong direction. For instance, I was listening to the hearing in my car and when a Republican member started asking a question the station played music drowning out the dialog.  It was disgusting.

I feel like Big Brother is everywhere controlling our content. I worry that the left is hijacking America with radical prosecutors being placed in our big cities and radical governors like Newsom being elected into our big states. Why is radicalism being rewarded?  Why does illegal activity by our government leaders like Biden and Brennan get applauded? What is going on?  Why has our media become so complicit or plain apathetic in all the illegal actions of infamous citizens from Weinstein to Epstein to Clinton to Biden?  It’s almost as though they have blinders on.  They used to care about getting to the truth. It used to be the media’s job to expose corruption. Now they just cover it up.  When did this all begin?

Image result for picture of a horse with blinders on

I’m sure it’s been slowly building up since the Bill Clinton impeachment and went totally rogue during the Bush years and now is off the charts haywire.  Thank God for FOX News; otherwise, there’d be no news. Ambassador Taylor is a rehearsed witness for the Democrats.  He was fed leading questions and answered them as practiced with Schiff.  He’s also an older guy trying to make himself look important. Obviously, he doesn’t think Trump is qualified to be president and wants to be part of history in taking him out. When asked about Biden and Hunter, he gets a blank face and says, “I don’t know.”  Kent at least admitted there could be an appearance of a conflict of interest with Hunter’s Burisma position.  Ya think? How convenient that they know so much about Trump’s involvement with Ukraine but with Biden, who’s been to the country many times, they play dumb.  This is clearly a coverup and a setup.  It’s so clear.

Schiff claimed he did not know who the whistleblower was.  That’s a blatant lie. But all he does is lie. This feigned protection of the whistleblower is getting old. We all know he has ties to Soros and is a partisan activist.  Then Schiff objects to a Republican member’s question clarifying that it states facts that are not in evidence.  While Schiff and his clowns posed all their questions with facts not in evidence.  This is not a fair hearing and the two witnesses are clearly against Trump but have never even met with him.  They’re part of the Nevertrumper clan and Obama holdovers.  They remained quiet when asked anything about Biden’s quid pro quo almost as though they were warned ahead not to answer anything about Joe. These witnesses behaved very similar to Mueller as a witness.  They look as though they’re completely unaware of some of the facts in the questions very much like Mueller was. “When in doubt, play dumb” seems to be the Democrat SOP.  Biden is definitely getting the Hillary treatment by the impeachment panel. Cover for him at all costs, even your reelection.

I think the public can see through this sham and that this first hearing was a big nothing burger.  The fact that the Democrats are so sympathetic to Ukraine all of a sudden is a joke.  They only care about them in reference to Trump’s phone call. Trump has done more to help this country than Obama ever did but they don’t want to bring that up.

Pelosi’s claim that all roads lead to Putin is a made up narrative by the left.  What it really should be is “All roads lead to Obama.”  But way to project, Pelosi. She’s acting so desperate now that the hearing has gone south. She has to go to the press and claim that “hearsay evidence” is the most important evidence one can have, that they don’t need first-hand evidence, and we’ll never see the whistleblower. Not over her dead body, apparently. Boy, oh boy are the left worried, or what, that he’ll have to be exposed and answer questions before the committee almost like an Avanati appearance–can only serve to hurt their impeachment case.

But seriously, if these two stiffs are the best the Democrats have against Trump, we better get out our pillows for the rest of this sham of a hearing.

photo of gray and white tabby kitten sitting on sofa
Photo by Tranmautritam on Pexels.com